Details
Details
- Reviewers
baymax - Group Reviewers
hg-reviewers
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rHG Mercurial
- Lint
Lint Skipped - Unit
Unit Tests Skipped
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
FB has users reporting they need to split commits in the middle of a histedit. So this might be too restrictive.
Comment Actions
Two thoughts:
- We had talked at Google about having the "edit" action create split markers if the user created multiple commits. Do you think that would address the FB users' use case?
- It seems very dangerous to not have this check at least when not using obsmarkers and there are descendants of the current commit (split then rebases the descendants), so I'd like to keep the check in at least that case.
Comment Actions
Oh, I should have said that I agree with not queuing this patch now. We can discuss what we want to do and do it on the default branch later.
Comment Actions
I think a most flexible solution is to not do the check if there is nothing to rebase.
Comment Actions
There seems to have been no activities on this Diff for the past 3 Months.
By policy, we are automatically moving it out of the need-review state.
Please, move it back to need-review without hesitation if this diff should still be discussed.
:baymax:need-review-idle: