In D5146#77492, @pulkit wrote:

I remember using chistedit and finding that the .hg/chisedit file is not deleted after chistedit is completed. Looking at code, I am unable to find code which deletes that file. Can you please have a look and delete that file after a successfull or aborted chistedit?

Correct, no tests in hg-experimental. I did a basic sniff test, but I don't really know how we do curses tests in general.

pulkit added a comment.

Is the goal is to include this in 4.8?

I have significant misgivings about exchanging raw disk contents. We should revisit this and see if we can do better in the future.

Replaced by a more principled collection of refactors that has the benefit of working.

In D5088#76414, @indygreg wrote:

In D5088#76278, @durin42 wrote:

Is there a way for me to specify something like "<=3.5" and "3.6<=" or similar?

Adding no- to the capability name will invert the condition. e.g. 3.5 will test false for no-py27 and no-py35 and true for no-py36 and no-py37.

If that is too confusing (I can make an argument it is), we could add a 2nd hghave series for the <= check. Say pymax27, pymax36 etc.

I'm in favor, but want to see a broader set of thoughts on this.

It sounds like @pulkit has some ideas on what needs to be done follow-up wise.

Switching to %s loses some quotes I like having.