- User Since
- Jun 28 2017, 8:54 PM (145 w, 13 h)
Queued the whole series based on @Alphare review. Many thanks to both of you.
Tue, Apr 7
I was trying to understand what's going on the test modified here and this patch helped me. Thanks!
Fri, Apr 3
Thu, Apr 2
Wed, Apr 1
Tue, Mar 31
I wanted to help with things here but unfortunately I have ~0 experience with shell scripts and the kind of process testing going in next few patches.
Mon, Mar 30
Thu, Mar 26
Fri, Mar 20
This one fails to apply on current tip of default. Can you rebase and resend?
Thu, Mar 19
I like the idea. IIRC, Ryan from FB hit similar issues in a sprint some years ago and came up with hg up --finish or something like that.
Sat, Mar 14
Wed, Mar 11
Tue, Mar 10
Forgot to mention, I tried to apply this patch on default and it failed. Now I see it's targeted for stable. Since most of the rust code is experimental/not much used, it should be fine to have this on default branch. Any reason why this is targeted for stable?
Mar 9 2020
and the following too to make test-check-format.t happy.
Amended the following to make test-check-module-imports.t happy.
test-duplicateoptions.py is failing with this patch. I dropped this from my push list, stripping the patch was resulting in complex state for me, so I used prune, kindly use touch locally.
The code looks good. Since the whole obsmarker thing is experimental, the config option here should be made experimental too.
Also, can you add tests when the config is set and --in-reply-to flag is used; and add info about that behavior in commit message?
@martinvonz this (and next few patches) seems accepted by you and Augie. Should I go ahead and push it or I missed some discussion on IRC about it?
Looks like we should test the interfaces.
Mar 6 2020
Mar 5 2020
I should add some tests.