Details
- Reviewers
Alphare - Group Reviewers
hg-reviewers - Commits
- rHGe33d7c39db47: rhg: demonstrate that rhg breaks on non-generaldelta revlogs
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rHG Mercurial
- Branch
- stable
- Lint
No Linters Available - Unit
No Unit Test Coverage
Event Timeline
tests/test-rhg-no-generaldelta.t | ||
---|---|---|
18 | This looks very complicated to not do much? I might not understand what it's trying to achieve |
tests/test-rhg-no-generaldelta.t | ||
---|---|---|
18 | The idea was to:
|
tests/test-rhg-no-generaldelta.t | ||
---|---|---|
18 | I was very specifically talking about the (seq.py 50; echo x) | (read; cat) > f part. Using tail -n +2 f gives you the same result while being less confusing (I think). Adding a comment saying what you're doing might be worthwhile too. |
tests/test-rhg-no-generaldelta.t | ||
---|---|---|
18 | Oh, I started with tail -n +2, but I switched to read; cat because I thought it's more portable and cleaner. |
The last update was to fix the issue with --pure: the output of debugdeltachain was different there.
This looks very complicated to not do much? I might not understand what it's trying to achieve