Page MenuHomePhabricator

fuzz: use a more standard approach to allow local builds of fuzzers
ClosedPublic

Authored by durin42 on Dec 6 2019, 3:51 PM.

Details

Summary

This is taken from the (improved since we started fuzzing) guide on ideal
integrations. Rather than have our own wonky targets for building outside the
fuzzer universe, we have a driver program we carry along and use when we're
not using LibFuzzer. This will let us jettison a fair amount of goo.

contrib/fuzz/standalone_fuzz_target_runner.cc is
https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/ file
projects/example/my-api-repo/standalone from git revision
c4579d9358a73ea5dbcc99cb985de1f2bf76dcf7, reformatted with out
clang-format settings and a no-check-code comment added. It allows
running a single test input through a fuzzer, rather than performing
ongoing fuzzing as libfuzzer would.

contrib/fuzz/FuzzedDataProvider.h is
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/ file
/compiler-rt/include/fuzzer/FuzzedDataProvider.h from git revision
a44ef027ebca1598892ea9b104d6189aeb3bc2f0, reformatted with our
clang-format settings and a no-check-code comment added. We can
discard this if we instead want to add an hghave check for a new
enough llvm that includes FuzzedDataProvder.h in the fuzzer headers.

Diff Detail

Repository
rHG Mercurial
Lint
Automatic diff as part of commit; lint not applicable.
Unit
Automatic diff as part of commit; unit tests not applicable.