Details
- Reviewers
baymax - Group Reviewers
hg-reviewers
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rHG Mercurial
- Lint
Lint Skipped - Unit
Unit Tests Skipped
Event Timeline
This patch does not changes any code. It only changes some test output. You need to change the error message in the code.
hgext/journal.py | ||
---|---|---|
310–314 | This is only for locking namejournal.lock and not for working directory lock and store lock. We need to improve message there too. | |
316 | remove which file manually to continue? I think we should delete the If it still fails, ..... remove the file manually to continue part. | |
tests/test-lock-badness.t | ||
18 | unrelated changes in the test file here and below. |
@pulkit done changes as per your suggestion in lock file too but what did you meant by storelock?
I am not sure the new message is much helpful. As JordiGH and others pointed out on IRC, it will definitely be helpful if we can show which operation has the lock right now.
Something like:
waiting for lock on working directory of b held by process '*' running <cmd-name> on host '*'
tests/test-extdiff.t | ||
---|---|---|
155 | unrelated changes. | |
tests/test-lock-badness.t | ||
18 | still here are unrealted changes. | |
62 | The output is not correctly aligned. |
So for which commands we can show this message, like i got message when i run hg commit --amend sometimes
There seems to have been no activities on this Diff for the past 3 Months.
By policy, we are automatically moving it out of the need-review state.
Please, move it back to need-review without hesitation if this diff should still be discussed.
:baymax:need-review-idle:
This is only for locking namejournal.lock and not for working directory lock and store lock. We need to improve message there too.