The concept is still call "Changeset Evolution". The "troubles" got renamed to
"instability", so the action can be renamed from "evolve troubles" to
"stabilize instability". However, the concept itself is still "Changeset
Evolution" so associated configuration should still live under "evolution".
Revert 6c1a9fd8361b first then the config renaming.
Details
- Reviewers
pulkit quark - Group Reviewers
hg-reviewers
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rHG Mercurial
- Lint
Lint Skipped - Unit
Unit Tests Skipped
Event Timeline
Although "stabilization" may be controversial, but I don't think "evolution" is a better choice.
Since we are here, I think we should come up with formal names. It makes more sense to me to split the giant config into different smaller ones, like:
[experimental] obsstore = bool allowunstable = bool obsexchange = bool ...
That's at least more consistent with expermental.allowdivergence, and is more flexible.
The reason experimental.stabilization is bad can not result in the conclusion that experimental.evolution is good. So @pulkit's +1 is questionable. Therefore requested changes to remove this from 2nd Pass queue. Feel free to request review again to move it back to 1st Pass queue if you believe this patch is still a good approach.
I concur with @quark: if we're going to bother renaming this again, we should just use the [experimental] namespace.
Sorry for the lag, I was at a conference.
I didn't planned for such changes, but I think it's a very good idea! I'm gonna send patches soon. Do you think I should start a new series of patch or add new patch on top of the backout?
I would bias towards just having one change that advances to using [experimental] if we want to rename this again. I don't think we need to take the rollback-then-forward approach, seems like unnecessary ceremony. Let's just talk this over at the sprint?
@durin42 Good for me, I don't have strong opinion on the matter. I will have a patch ready for the sprint.
What's the story with this revision? Should we close it and D762? Or do we have some revised versions I should look at?