Grouping all evolution related-config under the experimental.evolution
namespace would helps the future migration outside [experimental].
Details
Details
- Reviewers
indygreg - Group Reviewers
hg-reviewers - Commits
- rHG29f52e7966dd: config: gather allowdivergence under the evolution namespace
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rHG Mercurial
- Lint
Automatic diff as part of commit; lint not applicable. - Unit
Automatic diff as part of commit; unit tests not applicable.
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
I think this series overall cleans up the namespaces. I don't really love that evolution is still "hiding" under experimental but currently we don't have a way of marking non-"experimental" configs as experimental still so I guess this will have to suffice for now. I'll take a closer look tomorrow if nobody else gets to this first.
Comment Actions
I'm not a big fan of inserting evolution everywhere. It confuses people. I'd prefer things like experimental.obsstore=bool.
Comment Actions
@quark raises a valid point. The good thing is this is all under [experimental] which means there are no BC concerns. I'm all for bikeshedding a better naming strategy when things are marked as non-experimental. Until then, it isn't worth our time IMO.